Phage therapy as a glimmer of hope in the fight against the recurrence or emergence of surgical site bacterial infections.

PURPOSE: Over the last decade, surgery rates have risen alarmingly, and surgical-site infections are expanding these concerns. In spite of advances in infection control practices, surgical infections continue to be a significant cause of death, prolonged hospitalization, and morbidity. As well as the presence of bacterial infections and their antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation is one of the challenges in the treatment of surgical wounds. METHODS: This review article was based on published studies on inpatients and laboratory animals receiving phage therapy for surgical wounds, phage therapy for tissue and bone infections treated with surgery to prevent recurrence, antibiotic-resistant wound infections treated with phage therapy, and biofilm-involved surgical wounds treated with phage therapy which were searched without date restrictions. RESULTS: It has been shown in this review article that phage therapy can be used to treat surgical-site infections in patients and animals, eliminate biofilms at the surgical site, prevent infection recurrence in wounds that have been operated on, and eradicate antibiotic-resistant infections in surgical wounds, including multi-drug resistance (MDR), extensively drug resistance (XDR), and pan-drug resistance (PDR). A cocktail of phages and antibiotics can also reduce surgical-site infections more effectively than phages alone. CONCLUSION: In light of these encouraging results, clinical trials and research with phages will continue in the near future to treat surgical-site infections, biofilm removal, and antibiotic-resistant wounds, all of which could be used to prescribe phages as an alternative to antibiotics.

Stopping antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: An internal audit.

BACKGROUND: Antibacterial prophylaxis in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is controversial and not recommended by international guidelines. We analyzed relevant posttransplant outcomes following discontinuation of antibacterial prophylaxis at a major European pediatric transplant center. METHODS: The single-center retrospective audit included all pediatric allogeneic HCT patients (pts) transplanted between 2011 and 2020 before (≤2014) and after (≥2015) stopping routine antibacterial prophylaxis with penicillin, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin upon start of the conditioning regimen. The primary endpoint was overall survival until the first hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of fever; bacterial infections; and cumulative days with antibacterial agents until discharge. RESULTS: A total of 257 HCT procedures were performed in 249 pts (median age: 10 years, range, 0.2-22.5) for leukemia/lymphoma (n = 150) and nonmalignant disorders (n = 107). Of these, 104 procedures were performed before (cohort 1) and 153 after (cohort 2) stopping prophylaxis. Overall survival until discharge was 90.4% in cohort 1 and 96.1% in cohort 2 (p = .06). No differences were observed in the occurrence of fever (92.3 vs. 94.1%; p = .57) and bacterial infections (34.6 vs. 25.5%; p = .11). The median number of days on antibacterial agents was significantly lower in cohort 2 (39 vs. 34; p = .002). Detection rates of resistant organisms were overall low. CONCLUSION: In this single-center audit, the stop of routine antibacterial prophylaxis had no effect on the occurrence of fever, bacterial infections, resistant organisms, and GVHD. Overall antibiotic use was significantly reduced, and survival was noninferior to the historical control cohort.

Biopsia en ortopedia y riesgo de contaminación bacteriana durante el muestreo de tejidos: hechos y estrategias / Biopsy in orthopaedics and risk of bacterial contamination during tissue sampling: facts and strategies

Las biopsias en el campo de la ortopedia se utilizan para guiar las opciones de diagnóstico y tratamiento para el proceso de la enfermedad que puede estar ocurriendo. La preparación de la piel de estas biopsias sigue la preparación estándar para un procedimiento quirúrgico, con el objetivo de disminuir la cantidad de microbiota que podría conducir a la contaminación del tejido de la biopsia e incluso a una posible infección. El tejido obtenido de la biopsia a menudo se somete a un studio histopatológico y cultivo. La tasa de contaminación bacteriana informada es aproximadamente inferior al 4%. Esta revisión cuestiona si las muestras de las biopsias se contaminan con la microbiota que permanece en la piel y cómo puede afectar el manejo. Además, qué técnicas o pasos pueden disminuir la tasa de contaminación al realizar una biopsia. Nuestra revisión bibliográfica identificó pocos estudios sobre la contaminación bacteriana de las biopsias. Identificamos diferentes factores implicados en el conocimiento de la microbiota de la piel: técnicas y soluciones de preparación de la piel, variación de la microbiota típica que coloniza la piel según la región anatómica, retención preoperatoria versus administración profiláctica de antibióticos y uso de diferentes hojas de bisturí para la piel superficial y para tejidos profundos, entre otros. Aunque no pudimos identificar ningún dato que proporcionara respuestas a nuestra pregunta original y cuantificar cada factor individualmente, la mayoría de los estudios en diferentes campos ortopédicos proporcionaron hallazgos significativos hasta cierto punto. Describimos algunas recomendaciones prácticas basadas en el consenso y la efectividad teórica para disminuir la tasa de contaminación. Se necesitan más investigaciones en el campo de la ortopedia que impliquen la contaminación por microbiota de la piel de una biopsia

Biopsies in the field of orthopaedics are used to guide diagnostics and treatment options for the disease process that may be occurring such as a tumor or infection. Skin preparation of these biopsies follows the standard skin preparation for a surgical procedure, with the aim to decrease the amount of microbiota that could lead to contamination of the tissue biopsy and even possible infection. The tissue obtained from the biopsy often undergoes pathology and culture. The reported bacterial contamination rate is roughly below 4%. This review questions how samples from the biopsies are getting contaminated by microbiota that remains on the skin and how it affects infection management. In addition, which techniques or steps can decrease the rate of contamination when performing a biopsy. Our review identified little to no data on investigating bacterial contamination of biopsies. In doing this, the review identified different factors implicated in skin microbiota awareness: skin preparation techniques and solutions, variation of typical microbiota that colonize the skin based on the anatomical region, preoperative withholding versus administrating antibiotics prophylactically and using different scalpel blades for superficial and deep incisions, among others. Although we failed to identify any data that provided answers to our original question and quantify each factor individually, most studies in different orthopaedic fields provided significant findings to some extent. We outline some practical recommendations based on consensus and theoretical effectiveness in decreasing the contamination rate. Further research entailing skin microbiota contamination of a biopsy is needed in the field of orthopaedics.

Adherence to vaccination guidelines of patients with complete splenectomy in Norway, 2008-2020.

The spleen is responsible for blood filtration and mounting an immune response against pathogens. In some people the spleen must be surgically removed because of traumatic events or oncological and hematological conditions. These patients are at higher risk of developing diseases caused by encapsulated bacteria throughout their lives. Thus, immunisations are advised for splenectomised persons to prevent infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). This study assessed vaccination coverage (VC) among Norwegian patients with surgical asplenia. Using the Nomesco Classification of Surgical Procedures codes, patient information (age, sex, date of initial diagnosis and date of surgery) was acquired from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The National Immunization Register provided information on vaccination status and data of any subsequent invasive bacterial infections were obtained from the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases. From the total population of Norway, 3155 patients who had undergone complete splenectomy were identified. Of these, 914 (29.0%) had received at least one dose of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), 1324 (42.0%) at least one dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and 589 (18.7%) had received both. Only 4.2% of the patients had received two doses of a meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine, while 8.0% of 1467 patients splenectomised after 2014 had received at least two doses of a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine. The VC for Hib was 18.7%. Nearly all splenectomised children under the age of 10 were vaccinated with Hib and PCV as these vaccines are included in the childhood immunisation program. For all vaccines, VC decreased with age. Twenty-nine invasive bacterial infections were registered post-splenectomy in 25 patients. Vaccination according to national recommendations could have prevented at least 8 (28%) of these infections. Our study showed that efforts are required to increase VC of splenectomised individuals in Norway.

Most hospital patients at risk for bacterial infection undergo an anesthetic: implications for infection control practices related to the anesthesia workspace.

PURPOSE: Even with nearly 100% compliance with prophylactic antibiotic protocols, many surgical patients (> 5%) develop surgical site infections, some caused by pathogens transmitted from the anesthesia workspace (e.g., anesthesia machine), including multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Reducing contamination of the anesthesia workspace substantively reduces the risk of surgical site infections. We estimated the percentage of hospital patients at risk for health care-associated infections who may benefit from the application of basic preventive measures under the control of anesthesia practitioners (e.g., their hand hygiene). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study which included every patient admitted to the University of Miami Health System from April 2021 through March 2022 for hospitalization, surgery, emergency department visits, or outpatient visits. Lists were created for the start date and times of every parenteral antibiotic administered and every anesthetic. RESULTS: Among 28,213 patient encounters including parenteral antibiotic(s), more than half (64.3%) also included an anesthetic (99% confidence interval, 62.2 to 66.6). The hypothesis that most antibiotics were administered during encounters when a patient underwent an anesthetic was accepted (P < 0.001). This observation may seem counterintuitive because parenteral antibiotics were administered for fewer than half of the 53,235 anesthetics (34.2%). The result was a consequence of most anesthetics (63.5%) at the health system being conducted in nonoperating room locations, and only 7.2% of such patients received a parenteral antibiotic. CONCLUSIONS: Because approximately two-thirds of patients who receive an intravenous antibiotic also undergo an anesthetic, greater use of effective infection control measures in the anesthesia operating room workspace has the potential to substantively reduce overall rates of hospital infections.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Même avec un respect de près de 100 % des protocoles antibiotiques prophylactiques, bon nombre de patients et patientes en chirurgie (> 5 %) développent des infections du site opératoire, dont certaines sont causées par des agents pathogènes transmis par l'espace de travail anesthésique (p. ex. appareil d'anesthésie), y compris un staphylocoque doré multirésistant. La réduction de la contamination de l'espace de travail anesthésique réduit considérablement le risque d'infections du site opératoire. Nous avons estimé le pourcentage de patientes et patients hospitalisé·es à risque d'infections associées aux soins de santé qui pourraient bénéficier de l'application de mesures préventives de base sous le contrôle de praticiens et praticiennes d'anesthésie (par exemple, leur hygiène des mains). MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective qui comprenait toutes les personnes admises au Système de santé de l'Université de Miami d'avril 2021 à mars 2022 pour une hospitalisation, une intervention chirurgicale, des visites aux urgences ou des consultations externes. Des listes ont été créées pour la date et l'heure de début de chaque antibiotique parentéral administré et de chaque anesthésique. RéSULTATS: Parmi les 28 213 consultations avec les patient·es comprenant des antibiotiques parentéraux, plus de la moitié (64,3 %) comportaient également un anesthésique (intervalle de confiance à 99 %, 62,2 à 66,6). L'hypothèse selon laquelle la plupart des antibiotiques étaient administrés lors de rencontres lorsqu'une personne bénéficiait d'une anesthésie a été acceptée (P < 0,001). Cette observation peut sembler contre-intuitive, car des antibiotiques parentéraux ont été administrés pour moins de la moitié des 53 235 anesthésiques (34,2 %). En effet, la plupart des anesthésies (63,5 %) ont été administrées en dehors de la salle d'opération, et seulement 7,2 % de cette patientèle a reçu un antibiotique parentéral. CONCLUSION: Étant donné qu'environ les deux tiers des patientes et patients qui reçoivent un antibiotique par voie intraveineuse bénéficient également d'une anesthésie, une plus grande utilisation de mesures efficaces de contrôle des infections dans l'espace de travail anesthésique de la salle d'opération pourrait réduire considérablement les taux globaux d'infections hospitalières.

Impact of Prophylactic Norfloxacin in Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infections in the Early Liver Posttransplant Period.

OBJECTIVES: Norfloxacin is indicated as primary or secondary prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis. A history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis favors colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Infections caused by these bacteria increase morbidity and mortality after transplant. We investigated prophylactic norfloxacin as a risk factor for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in the early posttransplant period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included all adult liver recipients in 2 centers between 2015 and 2016. Recipients were classified into 2 groups according to whether or not they received prophylactic norfloxacin pretransplant. Data collection from liver recipients included pretransplant and first month after transplant clinical and microbiological data. Demographic and clinical data of corresponding donors were also collected. RESULTS: We included 157 liver recipients: 54 (34.6%) received norfloxacin and 103 (65.6%) did not received norfloxacin. There were 63 postoperative infections in 47 recipients (29.9%); 17/63 (27%) were multidrug- resistant bacterial infections. The urinary tract was the most commonly affected site (10/17 episodes, 58.8%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the microorganism most often isolated (8/17, 47.1%). Incidence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection was higher in the norfloxacin group (22.2% vs 4.9%; relative risk = 5.6, 95% CI, 1.85-16.89; P = .001).This association was significant after controlling for most confounding factors, including pretransplant vasoactive support (P = .03), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (P = .01), previous spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (P = .02), chronic renal impairment (P = .005), number of packed red blood cells (P = .004), use of antilymphocyte globulin as induction (P = .006), and hepatocellular carcinoma (P = .02), but not pre- transplant antibiotic treatment (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: For recipients who have received prophylactic norfloxacin, clinicians should be aware of the high risk of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections during the first month after liver transplant.

Endemic or regionally limited bacterial and viral infections in haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) Review.

Literature discussing endemic and regionally limited infections in recipients of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) outside western Europe and North America is scarce. This Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) article is part one of two papers aiming to provide guidance to transplantation centres around the globe regarding infection prevention and treatment, and considerations for transplantation based on current evidence and expert opinion. These recommendations were initially formulated by a core writing team from the WBMT and subsequently underwent multiple revisions by infectious disease experts and HSCT experts. In this paper, we summarise the data and provide recommendations on several endemic and regionally limited viral and bacterial infections, many of which are listed by WHO as neglected tropical diseases, including Dengue, Zika, yellow fever, chikungunya, rabies, brucellosis, melioidosis, and leptospirosis.

Photothermal Nanozyme-Based Microneedle Patch against Refractory Bacterial Biofilm Infection via Iron-Actuated Janus Ion Therapy.

Owing to high antibiotic resistance and thermotolerance, bacterial biofilm infections (BBIs) are refractory to elimination. Iron is essential for bacterial growth and metabolism, and bacteria can thus accumulate iron from surrounding cells to maintain biofilm formation and survival. Consequently, iron deficiency in the biofilm microenvironment (BME) leads to the functional failure of innate immune cells. Herein, a novel antibiofilm strategy of iron-actuated Janus ion therapy (IJIT) is proposed to regulate iron metabolism in both bacterial biofilm and immune cells. A BME-responsive photothermal microneedle patch (FGO@MN) is synthesized by the growth of Fe3 O4  nanoparticles on graphene oxide nanosheets and then encapsulated in methacrylated hyaluronic acid needle tips. The catalytic product of ·OH by FGO@MN in BME disrupts the bacterial heat-shock proteins, coercing biofilm thermal sensitization. As synergistic mild photothermal treatment triggers iron uptake, the intracellular iron overload further induces ferroptosis-like death. Moreover, iron-nourished neutrophils around BME can be rejuvenated for reactivating the suppressed antibiofilm function. Thus, more than 95% BBIs elimination can be achieved by combining heat stress-triggered iron interference with iron-nutrient immune reactivation. Furthermore, in vivo experiments validate the scavenging of refractory BBI after 15 days, suggesting the promising perspective of IJIT in future clinical application.

Impact of Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis on Neutropenic Fever, Infections, and Antimicrobial Resistance in Newly Diagnosed AML Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is recommended during induction chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to reduce risk of neutropenic fever and systemic bacterial infections. We evaluated the effectiveness of primary fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in an area with high fluoroquinolone resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of newly diagnosed adult AML patients who received frontline therapy at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, NY, between 2012 and 2019. Primary outcome was development of neutropenic fever. Secondary outcomes were development of systemic bacterial infections and infections with multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridioides difficile. Infectious outcomes were collected through 6 months after therapy initiation. We estimated the effect of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis with a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 121 included patients, 87 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 34 did not. There was no difference in baseline characteristics, although the prophylaxis group had longer neutropenia duration (median 30 vs. 23 days, P = .013). The prophylaxis group had a reduced risk of neutropenic fever (hazard ratio 0.59, P = .039). The prophylaxis group had fewer gram-positive (P = .043) and gram-negative (P = .049) bloodstream infections and fewer clinically documented infections during frontline therapy (P = .005) and follow-up (P = .026). There was no difference in incidence of C. difficile or infection with fluoroquinolone-resistant or multidrug-resistant organisms. There was no mortality difference between groups. CONCLUSION: In an area with high fluoroquinolone resistance, primary fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in newly diagnosed AML patients reduced the risk of neutropenic fever and systemic bacterial infections without increased antimicrobial resistance. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients who had undergone to prostate biopsy in between the EMA warning era: effects of fluoroquinolones in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Results of an observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) candidates to trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB). METHODS: 143 outpatients with DM who underwent TRUSPB during the period 2018-2020 were selected from a cohort of 1150 patients in 3 different institutions. Exclusion criteria were allergies, concomitant anti-platelet therapies and uncontrolled DM. Different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were adopted. Bacterial resistance levels to fluoroquinolones into the different communities were also collected. Univariable and multivariable binomial logistic regression analyses were used to assess the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) testing the risk of infective complications' occurrence after adjusting for clinical covariates. RESULTS: Overall, DM patients were significantly associated with infective complications' occurrence (p < 0.001). No differences on the event of sepsis were found between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Clinically relevant infections with fever > 37 °C were found in 9.1% and 1.5% (p < 0.001) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, respectively. Trimethoprim-sulphametoxazole and fluoroquinolones were six times more efficient than Cefixime in non-diabetic patients. Fluoroquinolones confirmed the same effect in diabetic patients although the level of resistance in the period of study decreased only from 56 to 46%. CONCLUSION: Fluoroquinolones were active in antibiotic prophylaxis of diabetic patients who had undergone to TRUSPB independently from the level of bacterial resistance found in the community. These results conflict with the recent European warning and support the Japanese and American guidelines on the topic.

Current status of rapid bacterial detection methods for platelet components: A 20-year review by the ISBT Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party Subgroup on Bacteria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bacterial contamination of platelet components (PCs) poses a safety challenge for transfusion patients. Despite mitigation interventions, the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections remains predominant. PC safety can be improved either by pathogen reduction or by implementation of bacterial detection methods. Detection methodologies include culture methods and rapid detection methods. The current review focuses on currently available rapid detection methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed published manuscripts since 2000 on rapid bacterial detection methods used for PC screening with result determination within 4 h. Methods meeting this criterion included Verax PGDprime, BacTx and nucleic amplification testing. The analytical and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of these systems were assessed. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity between the different detection methods ranged between 50 and 100,000 CFU/ml. The sample volume used by these testing systems varies between 0.5 and 1.0 ml of PCs. A delay of at least 48 h before sampling enhances detectability. All rapid detection methods generate results in a timely manner, allowing testing to be performed before transfusion with optimal sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Rapid detection methods improve PC safety regarding bacterial contamination. The assays are optimal for rapidly growing bacteria, which are more likely to cause septic transfusion reactions in patients. Because of the reduced diagnostic sensitivity, the sample collection should be late in shelf-life and ideally just before transfusion. The major benefit of these methods is that the test result can be obtained before releasing PCs for transfusion or to be used in combination with other screening methods applied early during PC storage.

A non-bactericidal cathelicidin provides prophylactic efficacy against bacterial infection by driving phagocyte influx.

The roles of bactericidal cathelicidins against bacterial infection have been extensively studied. However, the antibacterial property and mechanism of action of non-bactericidal cathelicidins are rarely known. Herein, a novel naturally occurring cathelicidin (PopuCATH) from tree frog (Polypedates puerensis) did not't show any direct anti-bacterial activity in vitro. Intriguingly, intraperitoneal injection of PopuCATH before bacterial inoculation significantly reduced the bacterial load in tree frogs and mice, and reduced the inflammatory response induced by bacterial inoculation in mice. PopuCATH pretreatment also increased the survival rates of septic mice induced by a lethal dose of bacterial inoculation or cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Intraperitoneal injection of PopuCATH significantly drove the leukocyte influx in both frogs and mice. In mice, PopuCATH rapidly drove neutrophil, monocyte/macrophage influx in mouse abdominal cavity and peripheral blood with a negligible impact on T and B lymphocytes, and neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, but not T and B lymphocytes, were required for the preventive efficacy of PopuCATH. PopuCATH did not directly act as chemoattractant for phagocytes, but PopuCATH obviously drove phagocyte migration when it was cultured with macrophages. PopuCATH significantly elicited chemokine/cytokine production in macrophages through activating p38/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and NF-κB p65. PopuCATH markedly enhanced neutrophil phagocytosis via promoting the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Additionally, PopuCATH showed low side effects both in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, PopuCATH acts as a host-based immune defense regulator that provides prophylactic efficacy against bacterial infection without direct antimicrobial effects. Our findings reveal a non-bactericidal cathelicidin which possesses unique anti-bacterial action, and highlight the potential of PopuCATH to prevent bacterial infection.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for acute cholecystectomy: PEANUTS II multicentre randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommending antibiotic prophylaxis at emergency cholecystectomy for cholecystitis were based on low-quality evidence. The aim of this trial was to demonstrate that omitting antibiotics is not inferior to their prophylactic use. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial randomly assigned adults with mild-to-moderate acute calculous cholecystitis (immediate cholecystectomy indicated) to 2 g cefazolin administered before incision or no antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all postoperative infectious complications in the first 30 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included all individual components of the primary endpoint, other morbidity, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Sixteen of 226 patients (7.1 per cent) in the single-dose prophylaxis group and 29 of 231 (12.6 per cent) in the no-prophylaxis group developed postoperative infectious complications (absolute difference 5.5 (95 per cent c.i. -0.4 to 11.3) per cent). With a non-inferiority margin of 10 per cent, non-inferiority of no prophylaxis was not proven. The number of surgical-site infections was significantly higher in the no-prophylaxis group (5.3 versus 12.1 per cent; P = 0.010). No differences were observed in the number of other complications, or duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Omitting antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy : In the context of restricted indications for fluoroquinolones and antibiotic stewardship]. / Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei transrektaler Prostatabiopsie : Im Kontext von Fluorchinolon-Indikationsrücknahme und Antibiotic Stewardship.

BACKGROUND: Transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) is the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis and among the most common urological interventions. Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is recommended for TRPB. Fluoroquinolone-PAP as standard of care needs to be revaluated due to the restrictions on the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze clinical practice of PAP for TRPB with focus on infectious complications and potential differences between fluoroquinolone-PAP and cotrimoxazole-PAP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocentric study of clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with TRPB between 3 January 2019 and 28 January 2021. RESULTS: A total of 508 men were included; median age was 68 years. In all, 55.9% of our cohort received cotrimoxazole-PAP and 40.0% fluoroquinolone-PAP. Postinterventional complications occurred in 5.5%, of those 50.0% were infectious complications. Complication rate did not differ between patients with fluoroquinolone-PAP and cotrimoxazole-PAP. Urinary cultures in case of postinterventional complications yielded pathogens with antimicrobial resistance against the used PAP substance indicating selection of resistant bacteria. CONCLUSION: Cotrimoxazole-PAP for TRPB is not associated with an increase of infectious complications compared to fluoroquinolone-PAP. Cultures obtained prior to TRPB to identify antimicrobial resistance facilitate targeted PAP and therefore can reduce complications.

Safety of continuous 12-hour delivery of antimicrobial doses of inhaled nitric oxide during ex vivo lung perfusion.

INTRODUCTION: High-dose nitric oxide (NO) has been shown effective against a variety of micro-organisms in vitro, including common bacteria found in donor organs. However, clinical obstacles related to its implementation in vivo are the formation of methemoglobin and the accumulation of toxic nitrogen compounds. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a platform that allows for organ maintenance with an acellular perfusion solution, thus overcoming these limitations. The present study explores the safety of continuous high-dose inhaled (iNO) during EVLP for an extended period of 12 hours. METHODS: Lungs procured from Yorkshire pigs were randomized into control (standard ventilation) and treatment (standard ventilation + 200 ppm iNO) groups, then perfused with an acellular solution for 12 hours (n = 4/group). Lung physiology and biological markers were evaluated. RESULTS: After 12 hours of either standard EVLP or EVLP + 200 ppm iNO, we did not notice any significant physiologic difference between the groups: pulmonary oxygenation (P = .586), peak airway pressures (P = .998), and dynamic (P = .997) and static (P = .908) lung compliances. In addition, no significant differences were seen among proinflammatory cytokines measured in perfusate and lung tissue. Importantly, most common toxic compounds were kept at safe levels throughout the treatment course. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose inhaled NO delivered continuously over 12 hours appears to be safe without inducing any significant pulmonary inflammation or deterioration in lung function. These findings support further efficacy studies to explore the use of iNO for the treatment of infections in donor lungs during EVLP.

Can alternative anatomical sites and environmental surveillance replace perianal screening for multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes?

Perianal screening can be intrusive. The sensitivities of multianatomical, nonperianal surveillance were 92.3% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 58.7% for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and 54.9% for resistant Gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB). Sensitivities improved upon adding environmental surveillance (95.5%, 82.9%, and 67.9%, respectively). Multianatomical, nonperianal screening and room environment surveillance may replace perianal screening and reduce healthy participant bias in nursing homes.

Infectious complications and vaccines.

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and can result in mortality in long-term survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and delayed immune reconstitution are recognized risk factors. Different strategies must be utilized depending on the individual patient's situation but include prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination. Some important infections due to pathogens preventable by vaccination are pneumococci, influenza, varicella-zoster virus, and SARS-CoV-2. Despite the fact that such recommendations have been in place for decades, implementation of these recommendations has been reported to be poor.

Moxifloxacin releasing intraocular implant based on a cross-linked hyaluronic acid membrane.

Intraocular antibiotic delivery is an important technique to prevent bacterial infection after ophthalmic surgery, such as cataract surgery. Conventional drug delivery methods, such as antibiotic eye drops, have limitations for intraocular drug delivery due to the intrinsic barrier effect of the cornea. Therefore, frequent instillation of antibiotic eyedrops is necessary to reach a sufficient bactericidal concentration inside the eye. In this study, an intraocular implant, MXF-HA, that combines hyaluronic acid (HA) and moxifloxacin (MXF) was developed to increase the efficiency of intraocular drug delivery after surgery. MXF-HA is manufactured as a thin, transparent, yellow-tinted membrane. When inserted into the eye in a dry state, MXF-HA is naturally hydrated and settles in the eye, and the MXF contained therein is delivered by hydrolysis of the polymer over time. It was confirmed through in vivo experiments that MXF delivery was maintained in the anterior chamber of the eye at a concentration sufficient to inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus for more than 5 days after implantation. These results suggest that MXF-HA can be utilized as a potential drug delivery method for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections after ophthalmic surgery.

[Prevention and management of infections in patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy: Recommendations of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]. / Prise en charge prophylactique, thérapeutique des complications infectieuses et vaccination des patients traités par CAR-T cells : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

Infections occurring after CAR T-cells are a common complication. At the acute phase of treatment following CAR T-cell infusion, the exact incidence of infections is unknown given the overlapping symptoms with cytokine release syndrome. The risk factors for infection include the malignant underlying disease and its multiple treatments, and an immunosuppressive state induced by CAR-T cells themselves and the treatment of their complications. During the twelfth edition of practice harmonization workshops of the Francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC), a working group focused its work on the management of post-CAR infectious complications. In this review we discuss anti-infection prophylaxis and vaccination of patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy as well as a special chapter for the specific case of COVID-19. These recommendations apply to commercial CAR-T cells, in order to guide strategies for the management and prevention of infectious complications associated with this new therapeutic approach.